Best FREE Bookmarking Site, Like RFANDL

10k Google visitor per Day for your website - EXCLUSIVE

Get unlimited lifetime VPN

Make MONEY Online 2018 proved!

loading...

Avatar
Openrotate5

0 Following 0 Followers
1
Deau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beast
Deau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beastDeau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beast frame, as we described above, it is, according to 2014 opinion norms, more reformoriented and consistent with the virus frame in these samples. In Thibodeau and Boroditsky's earlier samples that included the "neighborhood watch" option (i.e. [
1
Deau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beast
Deau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beastDeau and Boroditsky [5?] and in [7], and therefore congruent with the beast frame, as we described above, it is, according to 2014 opinion norms, more reformoriented and consistent with the virus frame in these samples. In Thibodeau and Boroditsky's earlier samples that included the "neighborhood watch" option (i.e. [
1
2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/jou
2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,10 /Metaphorical2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,10 /Metaphorical Reasoningthe order in which the policy approaches were presented to participants. It is n
1
2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/jou
2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,10 /Metaphorical2 (3.4 ) 39 (7.4 ) Watches 108 (30.19) 121 (23.0 )doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,10 /Metaphorical Reasoningthe order in which the policy approaches were presented to participants. It is n
1
Did not receive this question. Data from these participants were excluded
Did not receive this question. Data from these participants were excludedDid not receive this question. Data from these participants were excluded from one set of analyses (a test of whether the metaphors covertly affected reasoning).PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,5 /Metaphorical ReasoningFinally, in both experiments participants were asked a set of background demographi
1
Eas in our study, the option calling for increased "street patrolsEas in our study, the option calling for increased "street patrols" was the most popular (29.5 ). Despite this similarity, we found a difference in the distributions of policy preferences across the two experiments, 2(4, N = 876) = 24.554, p < .001 (see Table 2). One possible explanation for this difference may have to do with
1
Tes. This is important as we have found that people with
Tes. This is important as we have found that people withTes. This is important as we have found that people with, for instance, different political ideologies tend to think differently about crime and are affected differently by the frames [5?]. To find the best fitting logistic regression models for the data, we utilized a stepwise model selection algorithm from the MASS library in R [9?0].
1
Pproach is relatively reform-oriented; more extreme positive values indicate a view
Pproach is relatively reform-oriented; more extreme positive values indicate a viewPproach is relatively reform-oriented; more extreme positive values indicate a view that the policy approach is relatively enforcementoriented. The order of the policy options in both of the norming tasks was randomized. The matching task always preceded the rating task. Norming study 2 (norming task 3). In th